Retrieved from Vol. 8, No. 1, 2024
Pages 22 -29
Received 24.12.2023
Revised 01.04.2024
Accepted 28.04.2024
Retrieved from Vol. 8, No. 1, 2024
Pages 22 -29
Abstract
The hostilities that have been taking place in Ukraine since 2014 have made socio-political transformations related to the fateful issues of the future of the Ukrainian people and nation and their state-building processes particularly acute. In such circumstances, classical socio-philosophical issues come to the fore, as they allow us to comprehensively understand human social activity, its potential, and internal and external forces, and to assess the importance of the individual as a cultural and creative being. This issue is closely related to the anthropological one in the training of philosophers since future specialists must realize that man is the center of social and socio-political processes, that he is a microcosm in which the entire macrocosm is concentrated, as H. Skovoroda argued. The philosophical symbolism of the thinker’s work is directly related to wisdom, akin to work, seeing the great in the small, revealing the mystery through the symbolic world. This is the way to a happy life. To be a human being is to be a philosopher, says Hryhorii Savych and the fate of each person is inseparable from the fate of the nation, and this unity lies in the world of freedom, which many do not understand, because it requires fighting the whole world on the principles of love, not hatred. This is the classical Ukrainian philosophy founded by H. Skovoroda. Its task is to awaken the main slogans of the Enlightenment (honor and dignity, freedom, justice, solidarity, morality) and to practically direct them to achieve both one’s freedom and the freedom of an open society. The development of such a society in Ukraine is the goal of the modern national state-building process, and the realization of the value principles is the goal of philosophical education. Future philosophers, studying H. Skovoroda’s creative heritage, can trace the evolution of the human spirit: internally devastated, without certain life guidelines, a person gradually adapts to life in society; overcomes contradictions between the individual and the general, finds a compromise in relations with the environment. Of course, not everyone will be able to successfully go through the path of their spiritual formation, since this process requires a significant strain of internal and external forces, unity and struggle of mind and feelings, worldly wisdom, and a desire to join in finding out the causes of human cruelty and arbitrariness, identifying the sources of humanity in man and society
Keywords:
training of philosophers; antinomianism; anthropology; baroque culture; choice; state-building; existentialism; cordocentrism; human; mentality; freedom; socio-political processes; "kindred labor", values[1] Abramov, L.K. (2010). Social capital as an indicator of community development. In The book Centre of local activity on the basis of the house of culture: Methodology and technology of territorial community development (pp. 45-55). Kirovohrad: ISKM.
[2] Azarova, T.V. (2015). Social capital as an indicator of community development. Retrieved from https://www.lac.org.ua/sotsialnyj-kapital-indykator-rozvytku-hromady-2/.
[3] Bondarenko, I.S. (2016). Imageology in the system of humanitarian knowledge: Cultural and educational strategies. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia National University.
[4] Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 5/2015 “On the Strategy of Sustainable Development “Ukraine - 2020””. (January 2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015#Text.
[5] Gerasymchuk, Z.V. (2011). Stimulation of sustainable development of the region: Theory, methodology, practice: A monograph. Lutsk: Lviv National Technical University.
[6] Kolodiy, A. (2003). The essence of civil society and mechanisms of its influence on politics: Report at the final regional conference of the civil society champions project. Lviv.
[7] Oluyko, V.M. (2017). Tools for the development of amalgamated territorial communities in the context of decentralisation of power. Kyiv: Vaite.
[8] Putnam, R.D. (2001). Making democracy: Traditions of civic engagement in contemporary Italy. Kyiv: S. “Osnovy” Pavlychko Publishing House.
[9] Semygina, T. (2004). Work in the community: Practice and policy. Kyiv.
[10] Sustainable development goals: Ukraine: national report.(n.d). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/natsionalna-dopovid-csrUkrainy.pdf.
[11] Ukrainian Institute for Social Studies named after O. Yaremenko, Social Monitoring Centre. (2012). Monitoring of public opinion of the population of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://www.uisr.org.ua/.