Received 10.02.2022
Revised 15.04.2022
Accepted 30.05.2022
Retrieved from Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022
Pages 83 -91
Abstract
In the article, based on the analysis of modern aspects of the modernization of the world and national educational systems, the question of the formation of professional values and attitudes of specialists in the humanitarian field (philosophers, historians, religious scholars, philologists, culturologists) as carriers of general culture and creators of humanistic practices of the interaction of various social and ethnic groups on axiological grounds is updated. The paper aims to systematically analyze samples of psychological-pedagogical and philosophical-educational discourse, which reflect modern axiological ideas, the history of the development of educational values, and proposed means of implementing these assets in the national system of training specialists in the humanitarian field.Leading psychological-pedagogical models of discourse include freedom of thought as a variant of the individual’s freedom to choose a system of values (P. Shchedrovytskyi), the three-component approach to personality (G. Lasuel, Z. Freud); identification of value paradigms ofeducation (O. Sukhomlynska, N. Tkachova); the concept of education as a socio-cultural phenomenon (V. Ohneviuk); the need for corrections in the management of education as a socialinstitution (V. Kryzhko) and others. The assets of the philosophical and educational discourse of the research issue were chosen: S. Klepko’s identification of the leading regulatory values of education – love, and agreement with the values of being; interpretation of I. Utyuzh’s self-worth of education in line with the philosophical and anthropological tradition, the vision of the personality of a specialist as the dominant value of Ukrainian professional education; the scientific position of scientists regarding the fact that no value system can be implemented without the creative innovations of an individual since the development of professional culture is impossible without the cultivation of the individual's creative potential (A. Arkhiezer, M. Sheler, I . Ziaziun). It was found that the main perspective of the research is the search for ways to resolve the contradictions between the social demand for a creative, active, harmonious value system of a professional personality and the lack of value-oriented technologies for the professional training of masters in the humanitarian field
Keywords:
axiological principles; discourse; professional education; training of masters in the humanitarian field; pedagogical technologies; philosophical and educational ideas[1] Andrushchenko, V. (2008). Reflections on education. Kyiv: Knowledge of Ukraine.
[2] Andrushchenko, V., & Predborska, I. (2009). Philosophy of education. Kyiv: Drahomanov National Pedagogical University.
[3] Gubersky, L.V., Anrushchenko, V.P., & Mikhalchenko, M.I. (2002). Culture. Ideology. Personality: Methodological and ideological analysis. Kyiv: Knowledge of Ukraine.
[4] Klepko, S.F. (2009). Representation of Knowledge in the Educational Space (philosophical aspect). (Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
[5] Kryzhko, V.V. (2005). Anthology of the axiological paradigm of education. Kyiv: Education of Ukraine.
[6] Lasswell, G.D. (1994). The triple impact principle: A key to analysing social processes. Sociological Research, 1, 135-143.
[7] Leontiev, D.A. (1996). Value as an interdisciplinary concept: opit multidimensional reconstruction. Issues of Philosophy, 4, 35-44.
[8] Ognevyuk, V.O. (2003). Education in the system of values of sustainable human development. (Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[9] Shchedrovitsky, P.G. (1998). “At the turn”. (Lecture 3).
[10] Tkachova, N.O. (2006). Axiological approach to the organisation of the pedagogical process in a general educational institution. Kharkiv: Karavela.
[11] Utyuzh, I. (2011). Social and philosophical interpretation of axiological ideas of Ukrainian education. Humanitarian Herald of ZGIA, 44, 38-42.